Correlation Between Maple Leaf and Solid Impact

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and Solid Impact at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and Solid Impact into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and Solid Impact Investments, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and Solid Impact and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of Solid Impact. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and Solid Impact.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and Solid Impact

0.0
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Maple and Solid is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and Solid Impact Investments in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Solid Impact Investments and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with Solid Impact. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Solid Impact Investments has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and Solid Impact go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and Solid Impact

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf Foods is expected to generate 0.65 times more return on investment than Solid Impact. However, Maple Leaf Foods is 1.55 times less risky than Solid Impact. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Solid Impact Investments is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,354  in Maple Leaf Foods on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (345.00) from holding Maple Leaf Foods or give up 14.66% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionFlat 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  Solid Impact Investments

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Maple Leaf Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest unfluctuating performance, the Stock's forward indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.
Solid Impact Investments 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Solid Impact Investments has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Solid Impact is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Maple Leaf and Solid Impact Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and Solid Impact

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and Solid Impact positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, Solid Impact can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Solid Impact will offset losses from the drop in Solid Impact's long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and Solid Impact Investments pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world