Correlation Between Meta Platforms and MCF Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Meta Platforms and MCF Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Meta Platforms and MCF Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Meta Platforms and MCF Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Meta Platforms and MCF Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Meta Platforms with a short position of MCF Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Meta Platforms and MCF Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Meta Platforms and MCF Energy

0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Meta and MCF is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Meta Platforms and MCF Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MCF Energy and Meta Platforms is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Meta Platforms are associated (or correlated) with MCF Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MCF Energy has no effect on the direction of Meta Platforms i.e., Meta Platforms and MCF Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Meta Platforms and MCF Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Meta Platforms is expected to generate 3.11 times less return on investment than MCF Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Meta Platforms is 4.62 times less risky than MCF Energy. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MCF Energy is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.79  in MCF Energy on December 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.51  from holding MCF Energy or generate 13.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Meta Platforms  vs.  MCF Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Meta Platforms 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Meta Platforms are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat conflicting basic indicators, Meta Platforms may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in April 2025.
MCF Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Modest

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MCF Energy are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak basic indicators, MCF Energy reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Meta Platforms and MCF Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Meta Platforms and MCF Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Meta Platforms and MCF Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Meta Platforms position performs unexpectedly, MCF Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MCF Energy will offset losses from the drop in MCF Energy's long position.
The idea behind Meta Platforms and MCF Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk