Correlation Between Mene and Birks
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mene and Birks at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mene and Birks into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mene Inc and Birks Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mene and Birks and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mene with a short position of Birks. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mene and Birks.
Diversification Opportunities for Mene and Birks
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Mene and Birks is -0.58. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mene Inc and Birks Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Birks Group and Mene is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mene Inc are associated (or correlated) with Birks. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Birks Group has no effect on the direction of Mene i.e., Mene and Birks go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Mene and Birks
Assuming the 90 days horizon Mene Inc is expected to generate 1.5 times more return on investment than Birks. However, Mene is 1.5 times more volatile than Birks Group. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Birks Group is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest 7.50 in Mene Inc on December 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2.00 from holding Mene Inc or generate 26.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Mene Inc vs. Birks Group
Performance |
Timeline |
Mene Inc |
Birks Group |
Mene and Birks Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Mene and Birks
The main advantage of trading using opposite Mene and Birks positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mene position performs unexpectedly, Birks can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Birks will offset losses from the drop in Birks' long position.Mene vs. Lanvin Group Holdings | Mene vs. MYT Netherlands Parent | Mene vs. Movado Group | Mene vs. Birks Group |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.
Other Complementary Tools
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements |