Correlation Between MDA and AGEDB Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MDA and AGEDB Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MDA and AGEDB Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MDA and AGEDB Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MDA and AGEDB Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MDA with a short position of AGEDB Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MDA and AGEDB Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for MDA and AGEDB Technology

-0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between MDA and AGEDB is -0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MDA and AGEDB Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on AGEDB Technology and MDA is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MDA are associated (or correlated) with AGEDB Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of AGEDB Technology has no effect on the direction of MDA i.e., MDA and AGEDB Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MDA and AGEDB Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MDA is expected to generate 49.8 times less return on investment than AGEDB Technology. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, MDA is 6.4 times less risky than AGEDB Technology. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. AGEDB Technology is currently generating about 0.36 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  10.00  in AGEDB Technology on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  8.00  from holding AGEDB Technology or generate 80.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

MDA  vs.  AGEDB Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MDA 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

23 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MDA are ranked lower than 23 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, MDA displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
AGEDB Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days AGEDB Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.

MDA and AGEDB Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MDA and AGEDB Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite MDA and AGEDB Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MDA position performs unexpectedly, AGEDB Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AGEDB Technology will offset losses from the drop in AGEDB Technology's long position.
The idea behind MDA and AGEDB Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges