Correlation Between JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between JPMorgan Fundamental Data and Matthews China Discovery, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in JPMorgan Fundamental with a short position of Matthews China. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China.
Diversification Opportunities for JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China
-0.67 | Correlation Coefficient |
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between JPMorgan and Matthews is -0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding JPMorgan Fundamental Data and Matthews China Discovery in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Matthews China Discovery and JPMorgan Fundamental is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on JPMorgan Fundamental Data are associated (or correlated) with Matthews China. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Matthews China Discovery has no effect on the direction of JPMorgan Fundamental i.e., JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China
Given the investment horizon of 90 days JPMorgan Fundamental Data is expected to under-perform the Matthews China. But the etf apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, JPMorgan Fundamental Data is 1.44 times less risky than Matthews China. The etf trades about -0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Matthews China Discovery is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2,574 in Matthews China Discovery on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 243.00 from holding Matthews China Discovery or generate 9.44% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
JPMorgan Fundamental Data vs. Matthews China Discovery
Performance |
Timeline |
JPMorgan Fundamental Data |
Matthews China Discovery |
JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China
The main advantage of trading using opposite JPMorgan Fundamental and Matthews China positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if JPMorgan Fundamental position performs unexpectedly, Matthews China can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Matthews China will offset losses from the drop in Matthews China's long position.JPMorgan Fundamental vs. Vanguard Mid Cap Index | JPMorgan Fundamental vs. SPDR SP 400 | JPMorgan Fundamental vs. SPDR SP 400 | JPMorgan Fundamental vs. DBX ETF Trust |
Matthews China vs. Matthews Emerging Markets | Matthews China vs. Morgan Stanley Pathway | Matthews China vs. Neuberger Berman ETF | Matthews China vs. Fidelity Small Mid Cap |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.
Other Complementary Tools
Aroon Oscillator Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |