Correlation Between McDonalds and INTEL
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between McDonalds and INTEL PORATION, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on McDonalds and INTEL and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in McDonalds with a short position of INTEL. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of McDonalds and INTEL.
Diversification Opportunities for McDonalds and INTEL
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between McDonalds and INTEL is 0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding McDonalds and INTEL PORATION in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on INTEL PORATION and McDonalds is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on McDonalds are associated (or correlated) with INTEL. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of INTEL PORATION has no effect on the direction of McDonalds i.e., McDonalds and INTEL go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between McDonalds and INTEL
Considering the 90-day investment horizon McDonalds is expected to generate 2.25 times less return on investment than INTEL. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, McDonalds is 1.41 times less risky than INTEL. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. INTEL PORATION is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 7,822 in INTEL PORATION on December 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 803.00 from holding INTEL PORATION or generate 10.27% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 98.33% |
Values | Daily Returns |
McDonalds vs. INTEL PORATION
Performance |
Timeline |
McDonalds |
INTEL PORATION |
McDonalds and INTEL Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with McDonalds and INTEL
The main advantage of trading using opposite McDonalds and INTEL positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if McDonalds position performs unexpectedly, INTEL can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in INTEL will offset losses from the drop in INTEL's long position.McDonalds vs. Chipotle Mexican Grill | McDonalds vs. Dominos Pizza Common | McDonalds vs. Yum Brands | McDonalds vs. The Wendys Co |
INTEL vs. Hudson Pacific Properties | INTEL vs. Transcontinental Realty Investors | INTEL vs. PennantPark Floating Rate | INTEL vs. ARIA Wireless Systems |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.
Other Complementary Tools
Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk |