Correlation Between Mattel and Funko
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mattel and Funko at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mattel and Funko into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mattel Inc and Funko Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mattel and Funko and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mattel with a short position of Funko. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mattel and Funko.
Diversification Opportunities for Mattel and Funko
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Mattel and Funko is -0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mattel Inc and Funko Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Funko Inc and Mattel is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mattel Inc are associated (or correlated) with Funko. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Funko Inc has no effect on the direction of Mattel i.e., Mattel and Funko go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Mattel and Funko
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Mattel Inc is expected to generate 0.73 times more return on investment than Funko. However, Mattel Inc is 1.37 times less risky than Funko. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Funko Inc is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,768 in Mattel Inc on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 208.00 from holding Mattel Inc or generate 11.76% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Mattel Inc vs. Funko Inc
Performance |
Timeline |
Mattel Inc |
Funko Inc |
Mattel and Funko Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Mattel and Funko
The main advantage of trading using opposite Mattel and Funko positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mattel position performs unexpectedly, Funko can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Funko will offset losses from the drop in Funko's long position.Mattel vs. Funko Inc | Mattel vs. JAKKS Pacific | Mattel vs. Madison Square Garden | Mattel vs. Life Time Group |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Transformation module to use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments |