Correlation Between Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Macquarie Technology Group and Australian Potash, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Macquarie Technology with a short position of Australian Potash. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash.

Diversification Opportunities for Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash

-0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Macquarie and Australian is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Macquarie Technology Group and Australian Potash in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Australian Potash and Macquarie Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Macquarie Technology Group are associated (or correlated) with Australian Potash. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Australian Potash has no effect on the direction of Macquarie Technology i.e., Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Macquarie Technology Group is expected to generate 0.14 times more return on investment than Australian Potash. However, Macquarie Technology Group is 7.12 times less risky than Australian Potash. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Australian Potash is currently generating about -0.3 per unit of risk. If you would invest  8,565  in Macquarie Technology Group on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  379.00  from holding Macquarie Technology Group or generate 4.42% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Macquarie Technology Group  vs.  Australian Potash

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Macquarie Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Macquarie Technology Group are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Macquarie Technology may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Australian Potash 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Australian Potash has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash

The main advantage of trading using opposite Macquarie Technology and Australian Potash positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Macquarie Technology position performs unexpectedly, Australian Potash can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Australian Potash will offset losses from the drop in Australian Potash's long position.
The idea behind Macquarie Technology Group and Australian Potash pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk