Correlation Between Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litman Gregory Masters and Goldman Sachs Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litman Gregory with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs

0.65
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litman and Goldman is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litman Gregory Masters and Goldman Sachs Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Technology and Litman Gregory is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litman Gregory Masters are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Technology has no effect on the direction of Litman Gregory i.e., Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Litman Gregory is expected to generate 1.1 times less return on investment than Goldman Sachs. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Litman Gregory Masters is 6.77 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Technology is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,575  in Goldman Sachs Technology on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  16.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Technology or generate 0.45% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litman Gregory Masters  vs.  Goldman Sachs Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litman Gregory Masters 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litman Gregory Masters are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Litman Gregory is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Technology are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litman Gregory and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litman Gregory position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Litman Gregory Masters and Goldman Sachs Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account