Correlation Between MA Financial and Energy Resources

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MA Financial and Energy Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MA Financial and Energy Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MA Financial Group and Energy Resources, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MA Financial and Energy Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MA Financial with a short position of Energy Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MA Financial and Energy Resources.

Diversification Opportunities for MA Financial and Energy Resources

-0.77
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between MAF and Energy is -0.77. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MA Financial Group and Energy Resources in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energy Resources and MA Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MA Financial Group are associated (or correlated) with Energy Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energy Resources has no effect on the direction of MA Financial i.e., MA Financial and Energy Resources go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MA Financial and Energy Resources

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MA Financial is expected to generate 9.89 times less return on investment than Energy Resources. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, MA Financial Group is 15.52 times less risky than Energy Resources. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Energy Resources is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.50  in Energy Resources on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.30) from holding Energy Resources or give up 60.0% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

MA Financial Group  vs.  Energy Resources

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MA Financial Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MA Financial Group are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, MA Financial unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Energy Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energy Resources are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Energy Resources unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

MA Financial and Energy Resources Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MA Financial and Energy Resources

The main advantage of trading using opposite MA Financial and Energy Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MA Financial position performs unexpectedly, Energy Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Resources will offset losses from the drop in Energy Resources' long position.
The idea behind MA Financial Group and Energy Resources pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk