Correlation Between FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FIREWEED METALS P and Peak Minerals Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FIREWEED METALS with a short position of Peak Minerals. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals.

Diversification Opportunities for FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals

-0.3
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between FIREWEED and Peak is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FIREWEED METALS P and Peak Minerals Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Peak Minerals Limited and FIREWEED METALS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FIREWEED METALS P are associated (or correlated) with Peak Minerals. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Peak Minerals Limited has no effect on the direction of FIREWEED METALS i.e., FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals

Assuming the 90 days horizon FIREWEED METALS is expected to generate 31.23 times less return on investment than Peak Minerals. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, FIREWEED METALS P is 12.05 times less risky than Peak Minerals. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Peak Minerals Limited is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.20  in Peak Minerals Limited on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.20  from holding Peak Minerals Limited or generate 100.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

FIREWEED METALS P  vs.  Peak Minerals Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FIREWEED METALS P 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FIREWEED METALS P are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, FIREWEED METALS is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Peak Minerals Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Peak Minerals Limited are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Peak Minerals reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals

The main advantage of trading using opposite FIREWEED METALS and Peak Minerals positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FIREWEED METALS position performs unexpectedly, Peak Minerals can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Peak Minerals will offset losses from the drop in Peak Minerals' long position.
The idea behind FIREWEED METALS P and Peak Minerals Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals