Correlation Between Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Conservative Balanced Allocation and Goldman Sachs High, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Conservative Balanced with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs

0.72

Correlation Coefficient

Conservative Balanced  Goldman Sachs

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Conservative and Goldman is 0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Conservative Balanced Allocati and Goldman Sachs High in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs High and Conservative Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Conservative Balanced Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs High has no effect on the direction of Conservative Balanced i.e., Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Conservative Balanced Allocation is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Conservative Balanced is 1.75 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs High. It trades about -0.29 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs High is currently generating about -0.26 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  943.00  in Goldman Sachs High on October 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (16.00) from holding Goldman Sachs High or give up 1.7% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Conservative Balanced Allocati  vs.  Goldman Sachs High

Conservative Balanced

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Conservative Balanced Allocation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Conservative Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs High

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs High has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Conservative Balanced and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Conservative Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Conservative Balanced Allocation and Goldman Sachs High pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.