Correlation Between Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Learning Technologies Group and Sabre Insurance Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Learning Technologies with a short position of Sabre Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance

0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Learning and Sabre is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Learning Technologies Group and Sabre Insurance Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sabre Insurance Group and Learning Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Learning Technologies Group are associated (or correlated) with Sabre Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sabre Insurance Group has no effect on the direction of Learning Technologies i.e., Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Learning Technologies Group is expected to generate 0.75 times more return on investment than Sabre Insurance. However, Learning Technologies Group is 1.33 times less risky than Sabre Insurance. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sabre Insurance Group is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  9,210  in Learning Technologies Group on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  500.00  from holding Learning Technologies Group or generate 5.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Learning Technologies Group  vs.  Sabre Insurance Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Learning Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Learning Technologies Group are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Learning Technologies is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Sabre Insurance Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Sabre Insurance Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Sabre Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Learning Technologies and Sabre Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Learning Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Sabre Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sabre Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Sabre Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Learning Technologies Group and Sabre Insurance Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Options Analysis module to analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume