Correlation Between LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core and Redwood Systematic Macro, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor with a short position of Redwood Systematic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic.
Diversification Opportunities for LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic
0.74 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between LeaderSharesTM and Redwood is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Cor and Redwood Systematic Macro in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Redwood Systematic Macro and LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core are associated (or correlated) with Redwood Systematic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Redwood Systematic Macro has no effect on the direction of LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor i.e., LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic
Given the investment horizon of 90 days LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core is expected to generate 0.63 times more return on investment than Redwood Systematic. However, LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core is 1.59 times less risky than Redwood Systematic. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Redwood Systematic Macro is currently generating about -0.11 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4,165 in LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (66.00) from holding LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core or give up 1.58% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 98.39% |
Values | Daily Returns |
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Cor vs. Redwood Systematic Macro
Performance |
Timeline |
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor |
Redwood Systematic Macro |
LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic
The main advantage of trading using opposite LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor and Redwood Systematic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor position performs unexpectedly, Redwood Systematic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Redwood Systematic will offset losses from the drop in Redwood Systematic's long position.The idea behind LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor Core and Redwood Systematic Macro pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Redwood Systematic vs. Mid Cap Growth | Redwood Systematic vs. Needham Aggressive Growth | Redwood Systematic vs. Ftfa Franklin Templeton Growth | Redwood Systematic vs. The Hartford Growth |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bollinger Bands module to use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon.
Other Complementary Tools
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
Bonds Directory Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies | |
Efficient Frontier Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market. | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing |