Correlation Between Link Reservations and Real Brands

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Link Reservations and Real Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Link Reservations and Real Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Link Reservations and Real Brands, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Link Reservations and Real Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Link Reservations with a short position of Real Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Link Reservations and Real Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Link Reservations and Real Brands

-0.04
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Link and Real is -0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Link Reservations and Real Brands in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Real Brands and Link Reservations is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Link Reservations are associated (or correlated) with Real Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Real Brands has no effect on the direction of Link Reservations i.e., Link Reservations and Real Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Link Reservations and Real Brands

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Link Reservations is expected to under-perform the Real Brands. But the pink sheet apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Link Reservations is 27.81 times less risky than Real Brands. The pink sheet trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Real Brands is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  0.01  in Real Brands on November 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Real Brands or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy96.72%
ValuesDaily Returns

Link Reservations  vs.  Real Brands

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Link Reservations 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Link Reservations has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.
Real Brands 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Real Brands are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather inconsistent fundamental drivers, Real Brands exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Link Reservations and Real Brands Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Link Reservations and Real Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Link Reservations and Real Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Link Reservations position performs unexpectedly, Real Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Real Brands will offset losses from the drop in Real Brands' long position.
The idea behind Link Reservations and Real Brands pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities