Correlation Between Columbia Greater and Icon Financial

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Columbia Greater and Icon Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Columbia Greater and Icon Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Columbia Greater China and Icon Financial Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Columbia Greater and Icon Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Columbia Greater with a short position of Icon Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Columbia Greater and Icon Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Columbia Greater and Icon Financial

-0.47

Correlation Coefficient

Columbia Greater  Icon Financial

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Columbia and Icon is -0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Columbia Greater China and Icon Financial Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Icon Financial and Columbia Greater is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Columbia Greater China are associated (or correlated) with Icon Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Icon Financial has no effect on the direction of Columbia Greater i.e., Columbia Greater and Icon Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Columbia Greater and Icon Financial

Assuming the 90 days horizon Columbia Greater China is expected to generate 1.62 times more return on investment than Icon Financial. However, Columbia Greater is 1.62 times more volatile than Icon Financial Fund. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Icon Financial Fund is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,745  in Columbia Greater China on December 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  497.00  from holding Columbia Greater China or generate 13.27% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	98.36%
Values	Daily Returns

Columbia Greater China  vs.  Icon Financial Fund

Columbia Greater China

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Greater China are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Columbia Greater showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Icon Financial

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Icon Financial Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Icon Financial is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Columbia Greater and Icon Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Columbia Greater and Icon Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Columbia Greater position performs unexpectedly, Icon Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Icon Financial will offset losses from the drop in Icon Financial's long position.

The idea behind Columbia Greater China and Icon Financial Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.