Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Ithaca Energy PLC, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Ithaca Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy

-0.63

Correlation Coefficient

Litigation Capital  Ithaca Energy

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Ithaca is -0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Ithaca Energy PLC in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ithaca Energy PLC and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Ithaca Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ithaca Energy PLC has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to under-perform the Ithaca Energy. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Litigation Capital Management is 1.94 times less risky than Ithaca Energy. The stock trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Ithaca Energy PLC is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  10,449  in Ithaca Energy PLC on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,291  from holding Ithaca Energy PLC or generate 31.5% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Ithaca Energy PLC

Litigation Capital

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.

Ithaca Energy PLC

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ithaca Energy PLC are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Ithaca Energy exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Ithaca Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Ithaca Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ithaca Energy will offset losses from the drop in Ithaca Energy's long position.

The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Ithaca Energy PLC pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.