Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Ameriprise Financial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Ameriprise Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial

0.68

Correlation Coefficient

Litigation Capital  Ameriprise Financial

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Ameriprise is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Ameriprise Financial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ameriprise Financial and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Ameriprise Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ameriprise Financial has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to under-perform the Ameriprise Financial. In addition to that, Litigation Capital is 2.01 times more volatile than Ameriprise Financial. It trades about -0.34 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Ameriprise Financial is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  56,361  in Ameriprise Financial on September 20, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,893) from holding Ameriprise Financial or give up 3.36% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	95.45%
Values	Daily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Ameriprise Financial

Litigation Capital

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Ameriprise Financial

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ameriprise Financial are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Ameriprise Financial unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Ameriprise Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Ameriprise Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ameriprise Financial will offset losses from the drop in Ameriprise Financial's long position.

The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Ameriprise Financial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.