Correlation Between Leading Edge and Global Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Leading Edge and Global Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Leading Edge and Global Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Leading Edge Materials and Global Energy Metals, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Leading Edge and Global Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Leading Edge with a short position of Global Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Leading Edge and Global Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Leading Edge and Global Energy

0.37

Correlation Coefficient

Leading Edge  Global Energy

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Leading and Global is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Leading Edge Materials and Global Energy Metals in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Energy Metals and Leading Edge is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Leading Edge Materials are associated (or correlated) with Global Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Energy Metals has no effect on the direction of Leading Edge i.e., Leading Edge and Global Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Leading Edge and Global Energy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Leading Edge Materials is expected to generate 0.74 times more return on investment than Global Energy. However, Leading Edge Materials is 1.35 times less risky than Global Energy. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Global Energy Metals is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6.47  in Leading Edge Materials on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  8.53  from holding Leading Edge Materials or generate 131.84% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	95.31%
Values	Daily Returns

Leading Edge Materials  vs.  Global Energy Metals

Leading Edge Materials

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Leading Edge Materials are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile forward indicators, Leading Edge reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Global Energy Metals

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Energy Metals are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Global Energy reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Leading Edge and Global Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Leading Edge and Global Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Leading Edge position performs unexpectedly, Global Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Energy will offset losses from the drop in Global Energy's long position.

The idea behind Leading Edge Materials and Global Energy Metals pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Analyzer module to analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas.