Correlation Between Leading Edge and Alaska Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Leading Edge and Alaska Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Leading Edge and Alaska Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Leading Edge Materials and Alaska Energy Metals, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Leading Edge and Alaska Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Leading Edge with a short position of Alaska Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Leading Edge and Alaska Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Leading Edge and Alaska Energy

0.73

Correlation Coefficient

Leading Edge  Alaska Energy

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Leading and Alaska is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Leading Edge Materials and Alaska Energy Metals in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Alaska Energy Metals and Leading Edge is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Leading Edge Materials are associated (or correlated) with Alaska Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Alaska Energy Metals has no effect on the direction of Leading Edge i.e., Leading Edge and Alaska Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Leading Edge and Alaska Energy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Leading Edge is expected to generate 2.45 times less return on investment than Alaska Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Leading Edge Materials is 1.57 times less risky than Alaska Energy. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Alaska Energy Metals is currently generating about 0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  12.00  in Alaska Energy Metals on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Alaska Energy Metals or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Leading Edge Materials  vs.  Alaska Energy Metals

Leading Edge Materials

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Leading Edge Materials has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.

Alaska Energy Metals

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Alaska Energy Metals has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's primary indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.

Pair Trading with Leading Edge and Alaska Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Leading Edge and Alaska Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Leading Edge position performs unexpectedly, Alaska Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Alaska Energy will offset losses from the drop in Alaska Energy's long position.

The idea behind Leading Edge Materials and Alaska Energy Metals pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..