Correlation Between LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between LithiumBank Resources Corp and Juniata Valley Financial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in LithiumBank Resources with a short position of Juniata Valley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley.

Diversification Opportunities for LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley

-0.89
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between LithiumBank and Juniata is -0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding LithiumBank Resources Corp and Juniata Valley Financial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Juniata Valley Financial and LithiumBank Resources is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on LithiumBank Resources Corp are associated (or correlated) with Juniata Valley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Juniata Valley Financial has no effect on the direction of LithiumBank Resources i.e., LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley

Assuming the 90 days horizon LithiumBank Resources is expected to generate 1.57 times less return on investment than Juniata Valley. In addition to that, LithiumBank Resources is 1.64 times more volatile than Juniata Valley Financial. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Juniata Valley Financial is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,300  in Juniata Valley Financial on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  25.00  from holding Juniata Valley Financial or generate 1.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

LithiumBank Resources Corp  vs.  Juniata Valley Financial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
LithiumBank Resources 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days LithiumBank Resources Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward-looking signals remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
Juniata Valley Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Juniata Valley Financial are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Juniata Valley reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley

The main advantage of trading using opposite LithiumBank Resources and Juniata Valley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if LithiumBank Resources position performs unexpectedly, Juniata Valley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Juniata Valley will offset losses from the drop in Juniata Valley's long position.
The idea behind LithiumBank Resources Corp and Juniata Valley Financial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance