Correlation Between Transport International and China Communications
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Transport International and China Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Transport International and China Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Transport International Holdings and China Communications Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Transport International and China Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Transport International with a short position of China Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Transport International and China Communications.
Diversification Opportunities for Transport International and China Communications
0.26 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between Transport and China is 0.26. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Transport International Holdin and China Communications Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Communications and Transport International is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Transport International Holdings are associated (or correlated) with China Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Communications has no effect on the direction of Transport International i.e., Transport International and China Communications go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Transport International and China Communications
Assuming the 90 days horizon Transport International is expected to generate 3.4 times less return on investment than China Communications. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Transport International Holdings is 1.2 times less risky than China Communications. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Communications Services is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 51.00 in China Communications Services on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 2.00 from holding China Communications Services or generate 3.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Transport International Holdin vs. China Communications Services
Performance |
Timeline |
Transport International |
China Communications |
Transport International and China Communications Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Transport International and China Communications
The main advantage of trading using opposite Transport International and China Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Transport International position performs unexpectedly, China Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Communications will offset losses from the drop in China Communications' long position.Transport International vs. Grupo Carso SAB | Transport International vs. GEELY AUTOMOBILE | Transport International vs. ETFS Coffee ETC | Transport International vs. SWISS WATER DECAFFCOFFEE |
China Communications vs. Nippon Telegraph and | China Communications vs. Superior Plus Corp | China Communications vs. NMI Holdings | China Communications vs. SIVERS SEMICONDUCTORS AB |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Latest Portfolios module to quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets | |
Portfolio Holdings Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing | |
Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges |