Correlation Between Kollect On and Freemelt Holding
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kollect On and Freemelt Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kollect On and Freemelt Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kollect on Demand and Freemelt Holding AB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kollect On and Freemelt Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kollect On with a short position of Freemelt Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kollect On and Freemelt Holding.
Diversification Opportunities for Kollect On and Freemelt Holding
-0.51 | Correlation Coefficient |
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Kollect and Freemelt is -0.51. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kollect on Demand and Freemelt Holding AB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Freemelt Holding and Kollect On is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kollect on Demand are associated (or correlated) with Freemelt Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Freemelt Holding has no effect on the direction of Kollect On i.e., Kollect On and Freemelt Holding go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Kollect On and Freemelt Holding
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Kollect on Demand is expected to generate 0.16 times more return on investment than Freemelt Holding. However, Kollect on Demand is 6.41 times less risky than Freemelt Holding. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Freemelt Holding AB is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest 252.00 in Kollect on Demand on September 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 14.00 from holding Kollect on Demand or generate 5.56% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Kollect on Demand vs. Freemelt Holding AB
Performance |
Timeline |
Kollect on Demand |
Freemelt Holding |
Kollect On and Freemelt Holding Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Kollect On and Freemelt Holding
The main advantage of trading using opposite Kollect On and Freemelt Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kollect On position performs unexpectedly, Freemelt Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Freemelt Holding will offset losses from the drop in Freemelt Holding's long position.The idea behind Kollect on Demand and Freemelt Holding AB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Freemelt Holding vs. BIMobject AB | Freemelt Holding vs. Checkin Group AB | Freemelt Holding vs. Crunchfish AB | Freemelt Holding vs. Midsummer AB |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.
Other Complementary Tools
Sync Your Broker Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors. | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets |