Correlation Between Kulicke and Destination
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kulicke and Destination at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kulicke and Destination into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kulicke and Soffa and Destination XL Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kulicke and Destination and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kulicke with a short position of Destination. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kulicke and Destination.
Diversification Opportunities for Kulicke and Destination
0.76 | Correlation Coefficient |
Poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Kulicke and Destination is 0.76. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kulicke and Soffa and Destination XL Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Destination XL Group and Kulicke is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kulicke and Soffa are associated (or correlated) with Destination. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Destination XL Group has no effect on the direction of Kulicke i.e., Kulicke and Destination go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Kulicke and Destination
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Kulicke and Soffa is expected to generate 0.62 times more return on investment than Destination. However, Kulicke and Soffa is 1.61 times less risky than Destination. It trades about -0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Destination XL Group is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest 4,717 in Kulicke and Soffa on December 23, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,141) from holding Kulicke and Soffa or give up 24.19% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Significant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Kulicke and Soffa vs. Destination XL Group
Performance |
Timeline |
Kulicke and Soffa |
Destination XL Group |
Kulicke and Destination Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Kulicke and Destination
The main advantage of trading using opposite Kulicke and Destination positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kulicke position performs unexpectedly, Destination can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Destination will offset losses from the drop in Destination's long position.Kulicke vs. Ultra Clean Holdings | Kulicke vs. Ichor Holdings | Kulicke vs. Entegris | Kulicke vs. Amtech Systems |
Destination vs. Cato Corporation | Destination vs. Zumiez Inc | Destination vs. Tillys Inc | Destination vs. Duluth Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.
Other Complementary Tools
Transaction History View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |