Correlation Between Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kensington Managed Income and Anchor Tactical Equity, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kensington Managed with a short position of Anchor Tactical. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical.

Diversification Opportunities for Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical

0.59
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Kensington and Anchor is 0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kensington Managed Income and Anchor Tactical Equity in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Anchor Tactical Equity and Kensington Managed is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kensington Managed Income are associated (or correlated) with Anchor Tactical. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Anchor Tactical Equity has no effect on the direction of Kensington Managed i.e., Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical

Assuming the 90 days horizon Kensington Managed is expected to generate 1.77 times less return on investment than Anchor Tactical. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Kensington Managed Income is 3.2 times less risky than Anchor Tactical. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Anchor Tactical Equity is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,308  in Anchor Tactical Equity on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  165.00  from holding Anchor Tactical Equity or generate 12.61% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Kensington Managed Income  vs.  Anchor Tactical Equity

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Kensington Managed Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Kensington Managed Income are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Kensington Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Anchor Tactical Equity 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Anchor Tactical Equity are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Anchor Tactical is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical

The main advantage of trading using opposite Kensington Managed and Anchor Tactical positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kensington Managed position performs unexpectedly, Anchor Tactical can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Anchor Tactical will offset losses from the drop in Anchor Tactical's long position.
The idea behind Kensington Managed Income and Anchor Tactical Equity pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets