Correlation Between Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kensington Dynamic Growth and Kensington Defender Institutional, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kensington Dynamic with a short position of Kensington Defender. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender.
Diversification Opportunities for Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender
0.1 | Correlation Coefficient |
Average diversification
The 3 months correlation between Kensington and Kensington is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kensington Dynamic Growth and Kensington Defender Institutio in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Kensington Defender and Kensington Dynamic is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kensington Dynamic Growth are associated (or correlated) with Kensington Defender. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Kensington Defender has no effect on the direction of Kensington Dynamic i.e., Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender
Assuming the 90 days horizon Kensington Dynamic Growth is expected to generate 0.57 times more return on investment than Kensington Defender. However, Kensington Dynamic Growth is 1.76 times less risky than Kensington Defender. It trades about 0.42 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Kensington Defender Institutional is currently generating about -0.16 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,129 in Kensington Dynamic Growth on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 36.00 from holding Kensington Dynamic Growth or generate 3.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Kensington Dynamic Growth vs. Kensington Defender Institutio
Performance |
Timeline |
Kensington Dynamic Growth |
Kensington Defender |
Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender
The main advantage of trading using opposite Kensington Dynamic and Kensington Defender positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kensington Dynamic position performs unexpectedly, Kensington Defender can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Kensington Defender will offset losses from the drop in Kensington Defender's long position.The idea behind Kensington Dynamic Growth and Kensington Defender Institutional pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Kensington Defender vs. Scharf Fund Retail | Kensington Defender vs. Crossmark Steward Equity | Kensington Defender vs. Rbc Global Equity | Kensington Defender vs. Balanced Fund Retail |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Other Complementary Tools
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |