Correlation Between John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both John Hancock and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining John Hancock and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between John Hancock Ii and Goldman Sachs Large, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on John Hancock and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in John Hancock with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of John Hancock and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between John and Goldman is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding John Hancock Ii and Goldman Sachs Large in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Large and John Hancock is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on John Hancock Ii are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Large has no effect on the direction of John Hancock i.e., John Hancock and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon John Hancock Ii is expected to generate 1.28 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, John Hancock is 1.28 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Large. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Large is currently generating about 0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,568  in John Hancock Ii on September 19, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  348.00  from holding John Hancock Ii or generate 22.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.66%
ValuesDaily Returns

John Hancock Ii  vs.  Goldman Sachs Large

 Performance 
       Timeline  
John Hancock Ii 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in John Hancock Ii are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, John Hancock is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Large 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Large has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

John Hancock and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with John Hancock and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite John Hancock and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if John Hancock position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind John Hancock Ii and Goldman Sachs Large pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Investing Opportunities module to build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance