Correlation Between Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Juniper Networks with a short position of ClearSign Combustion. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion.

Diversification Opportunities for Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Juniper and ClearSign is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ClearSign Combustion and Juniper Networks is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Juniper Networks are associated (or correlated) with ClearSign Combustion. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ClearSign Combustion has no effect on the direction of Juniper Networks i.e., Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Juniper Networks is expected to generate 0.19 times more return on investment than ClearSign Combustion. However, Juniper Networks is 5.15 times less risky than ClearSign Combustion. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ClearSign Combustion is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,562  in Juniper Networks on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  58.00  from holding Juniper Networks or generate 1.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Juniper Networks  vs.  ClearSign Combustion

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Juniper Networks 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Juniper Networks are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Juniper Networks is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
ClearSign Combustion 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days ClearSign Combustion has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with conflicting performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion

The main advantage of trading using opposite Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Juniper Networks position performs unexpectedly, ClearSign Combustion can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ClearSign Combustion will offset losses from the drop in ClearSign Combustion's long position.
The idea behind Juniper Networks and ClearSign Combustion pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets