Correlation Between Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue Amer, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Johnson Johnson with a short position of Energy Revenue. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue.

Diversification Opportunities for Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue

-0.43

Correlation Coefficient

Johnson Johnson  Energy Revenue

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Johnson and Energy is -0.43. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue Amer in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energy Revenue Amer and Johnson Johnson is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Johnson Johnson are associated (or correlated) with Energy Revenue. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energy Revenue Amer has no effect on the direction of Johnson Johnson i.e., Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Johnson Johnson is expected to under-perform the Energy Revenue. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Johnson Johnson is 33.91 times less risky than Energy Revenue. The stock trades about -0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Energy Revenue Amer is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1.90  in Energy Revenue Amer on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1.61  from holding Energy Revenue Amer or generate 84.74% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Johnson Johnson  vs.  Energy Revenue Amer

Johnson Johnson

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Johnson Johnson has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain steady and the new chaos on Wall Street may also be a sign of medium-term gains for the company stakeholders.

Energy Revenue Amer

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

OK

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energy Revenue Amer are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Energy Revenue displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pair Trading with Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue

The main advantage of trading using opposite Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Johnson Johnson position performs unexpectedly, Energy Revenue can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Revenue will offset losses from the drop in Energy Revenue's long position.

The idea behind Johnson Johnson and Energy Revenue Amer pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.