Correlation Between Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings USA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Johnson Johnson with a short position of CLS Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings

-0.07
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Johnson and CLS is -0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings USA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CLS Holdings USA and Johnson Johnson is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Johnson Johnson are associated (or correlated) with CLS Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CLS Holdings USA has no effect on the direction of Johnson Johnson i.e., Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Johnson Johnson is expected to generate 2.37 times less return on investment than CLS Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Johnson Johnson is 12.04 times less risky than CLS Holdings. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CLS Holdings USA is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3.89  in CLS Holdings USA on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.83) from holding CLS Holdings USA or give up 21.34% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.36%
ValuesDaily Returns

Johnson Johnson  vs.  CLS Holdings USA

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Johnson Johnson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Johnson Johnson are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively conflicting basic indicators, Johnson Johnson revealed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
CLS Holdings USA 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CLS Holdings USA are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly fragile basic indicators, CLS Holdings demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Johnson Johnson position performs unexpectedly, CLS Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CLS Holdings will offset losses from the drop in CLS Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Johnson Johnson and CLS Holdings USA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data