Correlation Between John Hancock and Mfs Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both John Hancock and Mfs Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining John Hancock and Mfs Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between John Hancock Bond and Mfs Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on John Hancock and Mfs Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in John Hancock with a short position of Mfs Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of John Hancock and Mfs Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for John Hancock and Mfs Growth

-0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between John and Mfs is -0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding John Hancock Bond and Mfs Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Growth Fund and John Hancock is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on John Hancock Bond are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Growth Fund has no effect on the direction of John Hancock i.e., John Hancock and Mfs Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between John Hancock and Mfs Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon John Hancock is expected to generate 13.96 times less return on investment than Mfs Growth. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, John Hancock Bond is 2.52 times less risky than Mfs Growth. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.35 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  22,244  in Mfs Growth Fund on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,197  from holding Mfs Growth Fund or generate 5.38% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

John Hancock Bond  vs.  Mfs Growth Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
John Hancock Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days John Hancock Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, John Hancock is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mfs Growth Fund 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Growth Fund are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Mfs Growth may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

John Hancock and Mfs Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with John Hancock and Mfs Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite John Hancock and Mfs Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if John Hancock position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Growth will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Growth's long position.
The idea behind John Hancock Bond and Mfs Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Technical Analysis module to check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance