Correlation Between John Hancock and Boyd Watterson

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both John Hancock and Boyd Watterson at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining John Hancock and Boyd Watterson into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between John Hancock Funds and Boyd Watterson Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on John Hancock and Boyd Watterson and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in John Hancock with a short position of Boyd Watterson. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of John Hancock and Boyd Watterson.

Diversification Opportunities for John Hancock and Boyd Watterson

0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between John and Boyd is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding John Hancock Funds and Boyd Watterson Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Boyd Watterson and John Hancock is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on John Hancock Funds are associated (or correlated) with Boyd Watterson. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Boyd Watterson has no effect on the direction of John Hancock i.e., John Hancock and Boyd Watterson go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between John Hancock and Boyd Watterson

Assuming the 90 days horizon John Hancock Funds is expected to under-perform the Boyd Watterson. In addition to that, John Hancock is 1.39 times more volatile than Boyd Watterson Limited. It trades about -0.4 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Boyd Watterson Limited is currently generating about -0.23 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  984.00  in Boyd Watterson Limited on October 5, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (17.00) from holding Boyd Watterson Limited or give up 1.73% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

John Hancock Funds  vs.  Boyd Watterson Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
John Hancock Funds 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days John Hancock Funds has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward-looking signals, John Hancock is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Boyd Watterson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Boyd Watterson Limited has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Boyd Watterson is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

John Hancock and Boyd Watterson Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with John Hancock and Boyd Watterson

The main advantage of trading using opposite John Hancock and Boyd Watterson positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if John Hancock position performs unexpectedly, Boyd Watterson can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Boyd Watterson will offset losses from the drop in Boyd Watterson's long position.
The idea behind John Hancock Funds and Boyd Watterson Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated