Correlation Between IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between iShares Technology ETF and Esoterica NextG Economy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in IShares Technology with a short position of Esoterica NextG. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG.

Diversification Opportunities for IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between IShares and Esoterica is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding iShares Technology ETF and Esoterica NextG Economy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Esoterica NextG Economy and IShares Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on iShares Technology ETF are associated (or correlated) with Esoterica NextG. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Esoterica NextG Economy has no effect on the direction of IShares Technology i.e., IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG

Considering the 90-day investment horizon IShares Technology is expected to generate 1.28 times less return on investment than Esoterica NextG. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, iShares Technology ETF is 1.19 times less risky than Esoterica NextG. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Esoterica NextG Economy is currently generating about 0.18 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,678  in Esoterica NextG Economy on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,087  from holding Esoterica NextG Economy or generate 16.28% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

iShares Technology ETF  vs.  Esoterica NextG Economy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
iShares Technology ETF 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iShares Technology ETF are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly inconsistent basic indicators, IShares Technology may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Esoterica NextG Economy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Esoterica NextG Economy are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly inconsistent technical and fundamental indicators, Esoterica NextG demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG

The main advantage of trading using opposite IShares Technology and Esoterica NextG positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if IShares Technology position performs unexpectedly, Esoterica NextG can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Esoterica NextG will offset losses from the drop in Esoterica NextG's long position.
The idea behind iShares Technology ETF and Esoterica NextG Economy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences