Correlation Between Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Iridium Communications with a short position of Chesapeake Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy.
Diversification Opportunities for Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy
-0.4 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Iridium and Chesapeake is -0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Chesapeake Energy and Iridium Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Iridium Communications are associated (or correlated) with Chesapeake Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Chesapeake Energy has no effect on the direction of Iridium Communications i.e., Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Iridium Communications is expected to generate 2.13 times less return on investment than Chesapeake Energy. In addition to that, Iridium Communications is 1.36 times more volatile than Chesapeake Energy. It trades about 0.08 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Chesapeake Energy is currently generating about 0.24 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 5,770 in Chesapeake Energy on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 634.00 from holding Chesapeake Energy or generate 10.99% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 33.33% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Iridium Communications vs. Chesapeake Energy
Performance |
Timeline |
Iridium Communications |
Chesapeake Energy |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Solid
Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy
The main advantage of trading using opposite Iridium Communications and Chesapeake Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Iridium Communications position performs unexpectedly, Chesapeake Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Chesapeake Energy will offset losses from the drop in Chesapeake Energy's long position.Iridium Communications vs. IHS Holding | Iridium Communications vs. Cogent Communications Group | Iridium Communications vs. IDT Corporation | Iridium Communications vs. Cable One |
Chesapeake Energy vs. AKITA Drilling | Chesapeake Energy vs. Precision Drilling | Chesapeake Energy vs. The Gap, | Chesapeake Energy vs. Burlington Stores |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.
Other Complementary Tools
Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
Competition Analyzer Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities | |
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
Equity Search Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets |