Correlation Between Interroll Holding and Lem Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Interroll Holding and Lem Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Interroll Holding and Lem Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Interroll Holding AG and Lem Holding SA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Interroll Holding and Lem Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Interroll Holding with a short position of Lem Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Interroll Holding and Lem Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for Interroll Holding and Lem Holding

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Interroll and Lem is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Interroll Holding AG and Lem Holding SA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Lem Holding SA and Interroll Holding is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Interroll Holding AG are associated (or correlated) with Lem Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Lem Holding SA has no effect on the direction of Interroll Holding i.e., Interroll Holding and Lem Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Interroll Holding and Lem Holding

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Interroll Holding AG is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Lem Holding. However, Interroll Holding AG is 1.89 times less risky than Lem Holding. It trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Lem Holding SA is currently generating about -0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  267,000  in Interroll Holding AG on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (66,000) from holding Interroll Holding AG or give up 24.72% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Interroll Holding AG  vs.  Lem Holding SA

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Interroll Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Interroll Holding AG has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.
Lem Holding SA 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Lem Holding SA has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain fairly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest fuss may also be a sign of long-term up-swing for the venture sophisticated investors.

Interroll Holding and Lem Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Interroll Holding and Lem Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite Interroll Holding and Lem Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Interroll Holding position performs unexpectedly, Lem Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Lem Holding will offset losses from the drop in Lem Holding's long position.
The idea behind Interroll Holding AG and Lem Holding SA pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world