Correlation Between Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Icon Financial Fund and Columbia Seligman Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Icon Financial with a short position of Columbia Seligman. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman.

Diversification Opportunities for Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman

0.61

Correlation Coefficient

Icon Financial  Columbia Seligman

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Icon and Columbia is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Icon Financial Fund and Columbia Seligman Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Seligman Global and Icon Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Icon Financial Fund are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Seligman. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Seligman Global has no effect on the direction of Icon Financial i.e., Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman

Assuming the 90 days horizon Icon Financial Fund is expected to under-perform the Columbia Seligman. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Icon Financial Fund is 1.05 times less risky than Columbia Seligman. The mutual fund trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Columbia Seligman Global is currently generating about -0.02 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7,240  in Columbia Seligman Global on October 21, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (310.00) from holding Columbia Seligman Global or give up 4.28% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Icon Financial Fund  vs.  Columbia Seligman Global

Icon Financial

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Icon Financial Fund has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Columbia Seligman Global

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Columbia Seligman Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Columbia Seligman is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman

The main advantage of trading using opposite Icon Financial and Columbia Seligman positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Icon Financial position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Seligman can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Seligman will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Seligman's long position.

The idea behind Icon Financial Fund and Columbia Seligman Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.