Correlation Between Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Interactive Brokers Group and Piper Sandler Companies, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Interactive Brokers with a short position of Piper Sandler. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler.

Diversification Opportunities for Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Interactive and Piper is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Interactive Brokers Group and Piper Sandler Companies in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Piper Sandler Companies and Interactive Brokers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Interactive Brokers Group are associated (or correlated) with Piper Sandler. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Piper Sandler Companies has no effect on the direction of Interactive Brokers i.e., Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Interactive Brokers Group is expected to generate 1.63 times more return on investment than Piper Sandler. However, Interactive Brokers is 1.63 times more volatile than Piper Sandler Companies. It trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Piper Sandler Companies is currently generating about -0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  17,873  in Interactive Brokers Group on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,401) from holding Interactive Brokers Group or give up 7.84% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Interactive Brokers Group  vs.  Piper Sandler Companies

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Interactive Brokers 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Interactive Brokers Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable forward-looking signals, Interactive Brokers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
Piper Sandler Companies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Piper Sandler Companies has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler

The main advantage of trading using opposite Interactive Brokers and Piper Sandler positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Interactive Brokers position performs unexpectedly, Piper Sandler can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Piper Sandler will offset losses from the drop in Piper Sandler's long position.
The idea behind Interactive Brokers Group and Piper Sandler Companies pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals