Correlation Between Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hyster Yale Materials Handling and Microchip Technology Incorporated, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hyster Yale with a short position of Microchip Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hyster and Microchip is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hyster Yale Materials Handling and Microchip Technology Incorpora in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Microchip Technology and Hyster Yale is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hyster Yale Materials Handling are associated (or correlated) with Microchip Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Microchip Technology has no effect on the direction of Hyster Yale i.e., Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Hyster Yale Materials Handling is expected to generate 0.53 times more return on investment than Microchip Technology. However, Hyster Yale Materials Handling is 1.88 times less risky than Microchip Technology. It trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Microchip Technology Incorporated is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,216  in Hyster Yale Materials Handling on September 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (436.00) from holding Hyster Yale Materials Handling or give up 8.36% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hyster Yale Materials Handling  vs.  Microchip Technology Incorpora

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hyster Yale Materials 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hyster Yale Materials Handling has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.
Microchip Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Microchip Technology Incorporated has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hyster Yale and Microchip Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hyster Yale position performs unexpectedly, Microchip Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microchip Technology will offset losses from the drop in Microchip Technology's long position.
The idea behind Hyster Yale Materials Handling and Microchip Technology Incorporated pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Financial Widgets module to easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk