Correlation Between Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hyster Yale Materials Handling and MongoDB, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hyster-Yale Materials with a short position of MongoDB. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB.

Diversification Opportunities for Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB

-0.19
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hyster-Yale and MongoDB is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hyster Yale Materials Handling and MongoDB in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MongoDB and Hyster-Yale Materials is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hyster Yale Materials Handling are associated (or correlated) with MongoDB. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MongoDB has no effect on the direction of Hyster-Yale Materials i.e., Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Hyster Yale Materials Handling is expected to generate 0.46 times more return on investment than MongoDB. However, Hyster Yale Materials Handling is 2.16 times less risky than MongoDB. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MongoDB is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,689  in Hyster Yale Materials Handling on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  131.00  from holding Hyster Yale Materials Handling or generate 2.79% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hyster Yale Materials Handling  vs.  MongoDB

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hyster Yale Materials 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hyster Yale Materials Handling has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
MongoDB 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MongoDB are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, MongoDB is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hyster-Yale Materials and MongoDB positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hyster-Yale Materials position performs unexpectedly, MongoDB can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MongoDB will offset losses from the drop in MongoDB's long position.
The idea behind Hyster Yale Materials Handling and MongoDB pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.