Correlation Between Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Heidrick Struggles International and BG Staffing, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Heidrick Struggles with a short position of BG Staffing. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing.

Diversification Opportunities for Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing

-0.82
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Heidrick and BGSF is -0.82. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Heidrick Struggles Internation and BG Staffing in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on BG Staffing and Heidrick Struggles is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Heidrick Struggles International are associated (or correlated) with BG Staffing. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of BG Staffing has no effect on the direction of Heidrick Struggles i.e., Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Heidrick Struggles International is expected to generate 0.93 times more return on investment than BG Staffing. However, Heidrick Struggles International is 1.07 times less risky than BG Staffing. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. BG Staffing is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,655  in Heidrick Struggles International on September 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,749  from holding Heidrick Struggles International or generate 65.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Heidrick Struggles Internation  vs.  BG Staffing

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Heidrick Struggles 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Heidrick Struggles International are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite fairly weak forward indicators, Heidrick Struggles demonstrated solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
BG Staffing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days BG Staffing has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing

The main advantage of trading using opposite Heidrick Struggles and BG Staffing positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Heidrick Struggles position performs unexpectedly, BG Staffing can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in BG Staffing will offset losses from the drop in BG Staffing's long position.
The idea behind Heidrick Struggles International and BG Staffing pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.