Correlation Between Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Monolithic Power Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hewlett Packard with a short position of Monolithic Power. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power.

Diversification Opportunities for Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hewlett and Monolithic is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Monolithic Power Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Monolithic Power Systems and Hewlett Packard is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hewlett Packard Enterprise are associated (or correlated) with Monolithic Power. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Monolithic Power Systems has no effect on the direction of Hewlett Packard i.e., Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Hewlett Packard Enterprise is expected to under-perform the Monolithic Power. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Hewlett Packard Enterprise is 1.32 times less risky than Monolithic Power. The stock trades about -0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Monolithic Power Systems is currently generating about 0.0 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  61,830  in Monolithic Power Systems on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2,732) from holding Monolithic Power Systems or give up 4.42% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hewlett Packard Enterprise  vs.  Monolithic Power Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hewlett Packard Ente 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Hewlett Packard Enterprise has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Monolithic Power Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Monolithic Power Systems has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable basic indicators, Monolithic Power is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hewlett Packard and Monolithic Power positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hewlett Packard position performs unexpectedly, Monolithic Power can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monolithic Power will offset losses from the drop in Monolithic Power's long position.
The idea behind Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Monolithic Power Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope