Correlation Between Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hemisphere Energy with a short position of Maple Leaf. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf.

Diversification Opportunities for Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf

-0.02
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hemisphere and Maple is -0.02. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Maple Leaf Foods and Hemisphere Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hemisphere Energy are associated (or correlated) with Maple Leaf. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Maple Leaf Foods has no effect on the direction of Hemisphere Energy i.e., Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf

Assuming the 90 days horizon Hemisphere Energy is expected to under-perform the Maple Leaf. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Hemisphere Energy is 1.32 times less risky than Maple Leaf. The stock trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Maple Leaf Foods is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,134  in Maple Leaf Foods on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9.00  from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 0.42% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hemisphere Energy  vs.  Maple Leaf Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hemisphere Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hemisphere Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, Hemisphere Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Maple Leaf Foods are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy forward indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hemisphere Energy position performs unexpectedly, Maple Leaf can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will offset losses from the drop in Maple Leaf's long position.
The idea behind Hemisphere Energy and Maple Leaf Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes