Correlation Between Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Global Healthcare Income and Harvest Brand Leaders, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Global Healthcare with a short position of Harvest Brand. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand.

Diversification Opportunities for Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand

0.03

Correlation Coefficient

Global Healthcare  Harvest Brand

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Global and Harvest is 0.03. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Global Healthcare Income and Harvest Brand Leaders in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Harvest Brand Leaders and Global Healthcare is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Global Healthcare Income are associated (or correlated) with Harvest Brand. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Harvest Brand Leaders has no effect on the direction of Global Healthcare i.e., Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Global Healthcare Income is expected to generate 1.02 times more return on investment than Harvest Brand. However, Global Healthcare is 1.02 times more volatile than Harvest Brand Leaders. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Harvest Brand Leaders is currently generating about -0.07 per unit of risk. If you would invest  748.00  in Global Healthcare Income on December 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  60.00  from holding Global Healthcare Income or generate 8.02% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	95.24%
Values	Daily Returns

Global Healthcare Income  vs.  Harvest Brand Leaders

Global Healthcare Income

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Healthcare Income are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, Global Healthcare may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in May 2025.

Harvest Brand Leaders

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Harvest Brand Leaders has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Harvest Brand is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Pair Trading with Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand

The main advantage of trading using opposite Global Healthcare and Harvest Brand positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Global Healthcare position performs unexpectedly, Harvest Brand can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Harvest Brand will offset losses from the drop in Harvest Brand's long position.

The idea behind Global Healthcare Income and Harvest Brand Leaders pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.