Correlation Between Healthcare Global and Global Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Healthcare Global and Global Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Healthcare Global and Global Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Healthcare Global Enterprises and Global Health Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Healthcare Global and Global Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Healthcare Global with a short position of Global Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Healthcare Global and Global Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Healthcare Global and Global Health

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Healthcare and Global is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Healthcare Global Enterprises and Global Health Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Global Health Limited and Healthcare Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Healthcare Global Enterprises are associated (or correlated) with Global Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Global Health Limited has no effect on the direction of Healthcare Global i.e., Healthcare Global and Global Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Healthcare Global and Global Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Healthcare Global Enterprises is expected to generate 1.31 times more return on investment than Global Health. However, Healthcare Global is 1.31 times more volatile than Global Health Limited. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Global Health Limited is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  44,950  in Healthcare Global Enterprises on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,850  from holding Healthcare Global Enterprises or generate 8.57% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Healthcare Global Enterprises  vs.  Global Health Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Healthcare Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Healthcare Global Enterprises are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Healthcare Global may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Global Health Limited 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Global Health Limited are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Global Health is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Healthcare Global and Global Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Healthcare Global and Global Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Healthcare Global and Global Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Healthcare Global position performs unexpectedly, Global Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Global Health will offset losses from the drop in Global Health's long position.
The idea behind Healthcare Global Enterprises and Global Health Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Flow Index module to determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk