Correlation Between Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Blockchain Technologies ETF and Mackenzie Investment Grade, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Blockchain Technologies with a short position of Mackenzie Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment

-0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Blockchain and Mackenzie is -0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Blockchain Technologies ETF and Mackenzie Investment Grade in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mackenzie Investment and Blockchain Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Blockchain Technologies ETF are associated (or correlated) with Mackenzie Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mackenzie Investment has no effect on the direction of Blockchain Technologies i.e., Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Blockchain Technologies ETF is expected to under-perform the Mackenzie Investment. In addition to that, Blockchain Technologies is 8.32 times more volatile than Mackenzie Investment Grade. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Mackenzie Investment Grade is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  8,409  in Mackenzie Investment Grade on December 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  165.00  from holding Mackenzie Investment Grade or generate 1.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Blockchain Technologies ETF  vs.  Mackenzie Investment Grade

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Blockchain Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Blockchain Technologies ETF has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unfluctuating performance in the last few months, the Etf's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the ETF investors.
Mackenzie Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Investment Grade are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Mackenzie Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Blockchain Technologies and Mackenzie Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Blockchain Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Mackenzie Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mackenzie Investment will offset losses from the drop in Mackenzie Investment's long position.
The idea behind Blockchain Technologies ETF and Mackenzie Investment Grade pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios