Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Access and FT Cboe Vest, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of FT Cboe. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe

0.25
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and FNOV is 0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Access and FT Cboe Vest in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FT Cboe Vest and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Access are associated (or correlated) with FT Cboe. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FT Cboe Vest has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Goldman Sachs is expected to generate 4.98 times less return on investment than FT Cboe. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Access is 1.48 times less risky than FT Cboe. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. FT Cboe Vest is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,753  in FT Cboe Vest on October 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,145  from holding FT Cboe Vest or generate 30.51% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Access  vs.  FT Cboe Vest

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Access 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Access has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively invariable forward indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.
FT Cboe Vest 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FT Cboe Vest are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, FT Cboe is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.

Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and FT Cboe positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, FT Cboe can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FT Cboe will offset losses from the drop in FT Cboe's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Access and FT Cboe Vest pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance