Correlation Between Good Times and McDonalds Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Good Times and McDonalds Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Good Times and McDonalds Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Good Times Restaurants and McDonalds Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Good Times and McDonalds Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Good Times with a short position of McDonalds Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Good Times and McDonalds Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Good Times and McDonalds Holdings

0.61
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Good and McDonalds is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Good Times Restaurants and McDonalds Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on McDonalds Holdings and Good Times is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Good Times Restaurants are associated (or correlated) with McDonalds Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of McDonalds Holdings has no effect on the direction of Good Times i.e., Good Times and McDonalds Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Good Times and McDonalds Holdings

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Good Times Restaurants is expected to generate 1.89 times more return on investment than McDonalds Holdings. However, Good Times is 1.89 times more volatile than McDonalds Holdings. It trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. McDonalds Holdings is currently generating about -0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  294.00  in Good Times Restaurants on September 16, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (29.00) from holding Good Times Restaurants or give up 9.86% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Good Times Restaurants  vs.  McDonalds Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Good Times Restaurants 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Good Times Restaurants has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest inconsistent performance, the Stock's forward indicators remain healthy and the recent disarray on Wall Street may also be a sign of long period gains for the firm investors.
McDonalds Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days McDonalds Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's fundamental indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Good Times and McDonalds Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Good Times and McDonalds Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Good Times and McDonalds Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Good Times position performs unexpectedly, McDonalds Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in McDonalds Holdings will offset losses from the drop in McDonalds Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Good Times Restaurants and McDonalds Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments