Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Small and Wells Fargo Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Wells Fargo. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

0.9
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Wells is 0.9. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Small and Wells Fargo Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Wells Fargo Growth and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Small are associated (or correlated) with Wells Fargo. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Wells Fargo Growth has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Small is expected to under-perform the Wells Fargo. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Small is 1.25 times less risky than Wells Fargo. The mutual fund trades about -0.32 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Wells Fargo Growth is currently generating about -0.2 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4,607  in Wells Fargo Growth on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (921.00) from holding Wells Fargo Growth or give up 19.99% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Small  vs.  Wells Fargo Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Small 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Small has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's forward indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.
Wells Fargo Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Wells Fargo Growth has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's forward-looking signals remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Wells Fargo can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Wells Fargo will offset losses from the drop in Wells Fargo's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Small and Wells Fargo Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance