Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Mid and Columbia Strategic Income, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Columbia Strategic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic

0.49

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Columbia Strategic

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Columbia is 0.49. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Mid and Columbia Strategic Income in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Strategic Income and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Mid are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Strategic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Strategic Income has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Mid is expected to under-perform the Columbia Strategic. In addition to that, Goldman Sachs is 4.81 times more volatile than Columbia Strategic Income. It trades about -0.17 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Strategic Income is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,188  in Columbia Strategic Income on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  10.00  from holding Columbia Strategic Income or generate 0.46% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Mid  vs.  Columbia Strategic Income

Goldman Sachs Mid

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Mid has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Columbia Strategic Income

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Strategic Income are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Columbia Strategic is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Columbia Strategic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Strategic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Strategic will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Strategic's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Mid and Columbia Strategic Income pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.