Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Group and Nabors Energy Transition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Nabors Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy

0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Nabors is 0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Group and Nabors Energy Transition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nabors Energy Transition and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Group are associated (or correlated) with Nabors Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nabors Energy Transition has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Goldman Sachs Group is expected to under-perform the Nabors Energy. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Group is 9.13 times less risky than Nabors Energy. The stock trades about -0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Nabors Energy Transition is currently generating about 0.14 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  13.00  in Nabors Energy Transition on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3.00  from holding Nabors Energy Transition or generate 23.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Group  vs.  Nabors Energy Transition

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Group are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Goldman Sachs unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Nabors Energy Transition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nabors Energy Transition are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly inconsistent fundamental indicators, Nabors Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Nabors Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Nabors Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nabors Energy will offset losses from the drop in Nabors Energy's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Group and Nabors Energy Transition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities